In the afternoon program this Wednesday, the drivers of “Windowing” They took up the issue regarding the arrest warrant issued by a control judge, which could not be processed, because they won a temporary protection, however, Daniel Need He detailed that said petition has already obtained the character of definitive protection, so they can no longer be made available to the authorities and instead, he assured that they seek to sue the person responsible for the judicial proceeding in which they were involved a couple of weeks ago. .
On March 17, it was announced that through an arrest warrant, issued by a control judge attached to the CDMX Superior Court of Justice, Patricia Chapoy, Daniel Bisogno, Pedro Sola and Ricardo Manjarrez they would be arrested for up to 36 hours, because they had spoken about a subject that they had been warned about they could not treat during the program, but said order could not be processed, because the hosts of the show used the argument that they had not received any prior notification.
Days later, the members of “Ventaneando” spoke during the program, however, at that time they clarified that they could not detail who had requested the origin of the arrest from the control judge, because it was a legal process still underway. , but nine days after talking about the subject for the last time, they raised their voices again, because yesterday they were informed that the amparo judge had already granted a definitive amparo, which will prevent Chapoy, Bisogno, Sola and Manjarrez are arrested, as was claimed in the middle of the month.
“As you know, there is a judicial procedure in which it is intended to restrict the freedom of expression and the journalistic exercise of our drivers of ‘Ventaneando’, at the whim of an individual, against that arbitrariness, petitions for protection were filed, and the March 28, 2023, The amparo judge granted the definitive suspension of us drivers so that we would not be arrested”indicated the TV presenter.
“The doll” continued and stressed that said resolution demonstrated that there was “a malicious intent” by the individual who resorted to the expert authority in the search of committing an injustice “under a lack of appreciation of reality”, because at no time were they notified of the possible arrest to which they would be prosecuted. “We make it clear that freedom of expression will be defended until its last instances, since that right cannot be arbitrarily limited at the whim of individuals who use the judicial system untruthfully.”
For all of the above, Bisogno indicated that will exercise legal actions against the individual who tried to affect them and reiterated his commitment to the journalistic exercise that the program has carried out for 27 years, when its first program was broadcast.
MF
Themes
Read Also
Get the latest news in your email
Everything you need to know to start your day
Registering implies accepting the Terms and Conditions
