Suara.com – Putri Candrawathi’s lawyer, Arman Hanis, said that the public prosecutor’s (JPU) response was a failure because it was not based on legal arguments.
This was said by Arman in a duplic trial in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier Nofriansyah Yosua Hutabarat or Brigadier J at the South Jakarta District Court, Thursday (2/2/2023).
“We understand that perhaps the Public Prosecution Service is too tired to deal with all this, resulting in gaps and blank replicas here and there,” said Arman.
Also Read: Not Capable of Being Deceived, Mahfud MD Believes the Judge who Sentenced Ferdy Sambo Can Give Justice
The reply submitted by the prosecutor also made the team of legal advisers ask questions. “Did the Prosecutor knowingly make a replica that did not contain the legal argumentation?” said Arman.
Arman said, it was as if the prosecutor was compiling a replica with the same content in response to the duplicity of the other defendants. In fact, the facts at trial stated otherwise.
“The sweeping moves, or the same response to all the different arguments and facts, also appear in the replica,” he explained.
The replica, which contains 28 pages to reply to his party’s memorandum of defense which contains 955 pages, shows that the prosecutor is lost among the facts of the trial.
“The prosecution’s efforts to respond to the 955-page defense note with only 28 pages of replication filled with emotional sentences seem to get lost in a jungle of facts and arguments. The more the prosecution tries to refute, the more fragile the evidence becomes,” said Arman.
Read also: Mahfud MD believes the judge gives a fair verdict for Ferdy Sambo, not affected by the deception of the debate
Replica Jaksa
