Pensions, Landini unhappy after meeting with the executive: “It went badly”
“I say it precisely: we CGIL, CISL and UIL we have a unified platform, the same one we presented to previous governments. We want a real reform of the pension system, but we want to understand if there is the will at this table”. It is, according to what is learned, what the leader of the CGILMaurizio Landini during the table at the Ministry of Labor on the issue of pension reform with the government and social partners. “We want to understand some things: if there is the political will to make a serious reform based on our platform; what are the resources, because no reform is free of charge and finally the times because they are tight”.
The government-social partners meeting on pensions “didn’t go well, in the sense that we didn’t get any response” said the CGIL leader, at the end of the government-social partners meeting at the Ministry of Labour. Landini reiterated that No answer came from the table “if not a generic willingness to start discussion tables. They indicated a first meeting on 8 February on young people and women, but we have not had any response on the timing with which to make this comparison which for us must be done quickly before it is realized the Def because it is necessary to understand whether or not there are the resources and the political will to reform the Fornero law”, continued Landini. And again: “We have reiterated that, as far as we are concerned, the comparison must be made on the platform that the CGIL, CISL and UIL have illustrated and presented both to the government and Palazzo Chigi which has been reconfirmed here and for us the requests are very precise”.
To these issues, according to the leader of the CGIL, “to date we have not received substantive replies” and it is “clear that for us we need to move from words to deeds and there is also a need for much more precise answers than those that have been given today”. Also for Landini, “this continuing to have mega galactic tables with a number of associations, is fine for comparison, but we want to start a negotiation; for what that concerns us we want the government to respond to the platform and the demands that have been made”.
Subscribe to the newsletter
