Many have spoken about the controversial play that starred the National Classic between America club and the Chivas last Saturday September 17 on the field of Aztec stadium. While the rojiblancos they argue that it was a goal, the bluecreams They defend tooth and nail that the ball never crossed the line.
Analysts, journalists, reporters, former referees, fans, all have given their opinions on the subject in a clear division that does not show any agreement. However, it was missing Armancho Archundiawho currently heads the Arbitration Commission in Mexico Break the silence and make your statement.
About, Archundia supported the decision made by the whistler Adonai Escobedoits refereeing body and the WASsince he argues that there is no forceful shot that could verify that the ball did cross the goal line, therefore the decision not to validate it was well applied.
“There is no forceful decision if the ball crossed the line, therefore the decision that is made is totally correct and that is how we will give our evaluation and the teams know that. Week by week we do the analysis, we meet, we give our points of view, the analysis is done based on the rule to be clearer about what we are marking,” he said.
Despite the fact that almost a week has passed, from the rojiblanco camp they were very dissatisfied with the decision and even their own commission had to issue a fine Richard Chain for his post-match remarks. In the case of Ricardo Pelaezit was said that he tried to get into the referees’ locker room to complain, but security denied him access.
Get the latest news in your email
Everything you need to know to start your day
Registering implies accepting the Terms and Conditions