The 1-1 of the Allianz between Juventus e Bologna brought with it a legacy of controversy, criticism related to the management of the challenge by Sacks and the excited final of the race. Today’s edition of The Gazzetta dello Sportas usual, he offers his own point of view on what happened at the arbitrage level.
Obviously the episode that took place at 81 ‘was decisive: Soumoaro intervenes in a foul way on Morata at the edge of the area, Cuadrado bursts in and takes the crossbar, the referee lets it go and does not intervene. At that point the WASrecalling the referee in the light of the foul intervention of the rossoblù center on a clear scoring opportunity, resulting in red.
The critique of Journal it does not refer to the lack of rigor: the newspaper explains how Soumaoro’s intervention took place just off the line, instead focusing on the subsequent management and on the exasperation of minds (with a lot of red in Medel). The vote chosen for the referee is a 5, a low vote due to the unrecognized foul of Soumaoro and the subsequent indecision in the management of the incident, so much so as to raise the controversy and nervousness on the pitch.
Different version offered by Tuttosport which, for its part, not only criticizes the management of the episode but enters precisely into the merits: the Turin newspaper underlines how the intervention both in the area and how Sacchi trusted (incorrectly) a still image. Different versions of several newspapers: the proverbial episode at the limit.
follow 90min are Instagram.
