LONDON. It’s not always Bill Gates’ nefarious plots, mind control through 5G antennas, or elaborate conspiracies about a “plandemic” involving bioweapons created and tracked by Pfizer. Some of the more convincing arguments of the No vaxes use real data and cite official sources, but draw incorrect conclusions. Here then is the guide of the head of the Science channel of the Times, Tom Whipple who comes to our rescue, explaining in the English newspaper some of the most common and persuasive arguments and why they are wrong.
